[Teaching and learning during attending rounds in internal medicine: an anthropological study]. / Enseigner et apprendre lors des grandes visites en médecine interne hospitalière : Une étude anthropologique.

This anthropological research aims to highlight the educational approaches in action during attending rounds. The goal is to understand how specific learning domains, professional socialization and learning environments are influenced by the different ways of conducting attending rounds. Two formats of rounds were noted: the IN format, when the patient case is presented in the patient room, and the OUT format. Six educational approaches were identified. The attending round format has an impact on the approaches used. The latter contribute to the development, to varying degrees, of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Attending rounds remain a space for "top-down" transmission and supervision, even though some approaches involve learner initiatives and peer group logic.

Notre recherche anthropologique vise à mettre en lumière les approches pédagogiques à l'œuvre durant les grandes visites. Comment les domaines d'apprentissages visés, la socialisation professionnelle et l'environnement d'apprentissage sont-ils influencés par les différentes manières de les conduire ? Deux formes de visites sont retrouvées : la forme IN (le cas est présenté au lit du patient) et la forme OUT. Six approches pédagogiques ont été identifiées. La forme de grande visite influence les approches pédagogiques mobilisées. Celles-ci contribuent à développer, à des degrés variables, des savoirs, savoir-faire et savoir-être. Les grandes visites restent un espace de transmission « top-down ¼ et de surveillance, même si certaines approches encouragent les initiatives des apprenants ainsi que les logiques de groupes de pairs.

Thinking rural health in Santal community in West Bengal: An interprofessional bottom-up approach to rural health.

BACKGROUND: An interprofessional and cross-cultural pedagogical project in community health for students in nursing, social work, anthropology and medicine at the end of the bachelor's degree begun in 2014. After a rural context fieldwork in several Santal villages of West Bengal (India), students had to conduct a research project, based on a community-health topic. AIMS: This paper describes how such a pedagogical project, introducing students to ethnographic research, can initiate new ways of thinking for possible future health interventions in rural communities. METHODS: An inductive approach based on ethnography was used during the fieldwork, including observations, interviews, focus groups and local documentation. RESULTS: Our observations led to the finding that actions in rural health cannot be initiated without: promoting an interprofessional/interdisciplinary perspective and a culture of complexity and reflectivity; considering local populations in transition and not in a fixed homogenous situation; understanding more than imposing; taking into account local disease classification and local pragmatic solutions; considering the dialogue between bio-medicine and therapeutic pluralism; considering local perceptions and practices; considering care itineraries/pathways; and finally being conscious of our apostolic function. CONCLUSION: Our interprofessional pedagogical project promotes a bottom-up approach in dialogue with a global health vision.

Ethical, pedagogical, socio-political and anthropological implications of quaternary prevention / Implicações éticas, pedagógicas, sócio-políticas e antropológicas da prevenção quaternária / Implicaciones éticas, pedagógicas, sociopolíticas y antropológicas de la prevención cuaternaria

The concept of quaternary prevention, resulting from a reflection on the doctor-patient relationship, is presented as a renewal of the age-old ethical requirement: first, a doctor must do no harm; second, the doctor must control himself/herself. The origin of the concept, its endorsement by the World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA) and the European Union of General Practitioners (UEMO), its dissemination, and the debates to which it has given rise, are presented by a panel of authors from 10 countries. This collective text deals more specifically with: the bioethics of prevention, the importance of teaching Quaternary prevention and factual medicine, the social and political implications of the concept of quaternary prevention, and its anthropological dimensions.

Description of a Tertiary Swiss University Hospital palliative population based on the International Classification of Disease (ICD): a retrospective pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The factors for assessing the utilization rate of a palliative care service are various and complex. Several authors have described different methods to address this problem. McNamara and colleagues have proposed criteria to determine "minimal," "mid-range," and "maximal" palliative population estimates. In order to evaluate the utilization of our intrahospital palliative care consult team (PCT), it appeared necessary to better describe and define the population who dies in our institution, a Swiss university hospital. The goal of this pilot study was to determine what percentage of patients who died in our hospital over a 4-month period in 2007 was seen by the palliative care consult team (PCT), using "minimal" and "maximal" population estimates. METHODS: The hospital database was searched for all adult patients who died during that period and the "maximal" and "minimal" populations determined. The PCT's database was searched to identify those patients who had been seen by the PCT. The charts of a random sample of patients who did not initially meet the "minimal" criteria were hand searched. RESULTS: A total of 294 adult deaths were reported: 263 (89%) met the "maximal" criteria and 83 (28%) met the "minimal" criteria initially. The random search of 56 charts of the 180 patients who did not meet the "minimal" criteria revealed that 21 (38%) should have been included in the "minimal" population. The PCT saw 67/263 (25.5%) of the "maximal" palliative patient population and 56/151 (37.1%) of the "minimal" palliative population. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the usefulness of the method proposed by McNamara and colleagues to determine palliative populations. However, it also illustrates an important limitation of the "minimal" estimate and reliance on the accuracy of the cause of death as noted on the death certificate. A strategy to address this limitation is suggested. The "maximal" estimate suggests that the PCT is being underutilized.